OT

The debate last night had a lot of stuff about Gay Marriage versus Civil Unions. I had a long argument about this subject when I was talking to a gay friend. When I told him I was in favor of civil unions, he objected strenuously. "That's Separate but Equal all over again. It didn't work for black education, and it should not work for marriage," he said. But I really do want to take it one step further. I think all current legal marriages in the eyes of the State should be converted to Civil Unions, and be given all legal rights currently given, including inheritance, hospital visitation rights, benefits, etc. Civil unions can be between anyone. I also don't have a problem with civil unions involving more than one person, but I know this is probably too far for the mainstream.

Marriage is a sacrament. Just like baptism, just like communion, just like the last rites. It's one of eight, according to the Catholic Church, that one may have in life. As a sacrament, it can only be defined by the Church blessing the sacrament. So if the Church of the Plastic Bible says marriage must be between a man and a woman- that's the right of the Church of the Plastic Bible. If the Church of the Elastic Fruitbat decides that marriage is only between a man and a cabbage, well then, that's the right of the Church of the Elastic Fruitbat.

What we need is true separation of Church and State in this matter. Civil Unions should provide civil rights. Marriage is just for the blessing of the church only, and for those who believe in such, should reflect on that only.  ¶ 8:53 AM